peace of mind
i think that if we are going to reform the world, and make it a better place to live in, the way to do it is not with talk about relationships of a political nature, which are inevitably dualistic, full of subjects and objects and their relationship to one another; or with programs full of things for other people to do. i think that kind of approach starts it at the end and presumes the end is the beginning. programs of a political nature are important end products of social quality that can be effective only if the underlying structure of social values is right. the social values are right only if the individual values are right. the place to improve the world is first in one's own heart and head and hands, and then work outward from there. other people can talk about how to expand the destiny of mankind. i just want to talk about how to fix a motorcycle. i think that what i have to say has more lasting value.okay... so i keep banging on about this book, but my mind drifted to zen and the art of motocycle maintenance again whilst i was carrying out my long and tedious tax-accounting sox-driven quarter-end duties late on friday night. the drifting was driven primarily by one question: why the fuck am i doing this?
the result is rather typical of modern technology, an overall dullness of appearance so depressing that it must be overlaid with a veneer of "style" to make it acceptable. and that, to anyone who is sensitive to romantic quality, just makes it all the worse. now it's not just depressingly dull, it's also phony. put the two together and you get a pretty accurate description of modern american technology: stylized cars and stylized outboard motors and stylized typewriters and stylized clothes. stylized refrigerators filled with stylized food in stylized kitchens in stylized houses. plastic stylized toys for stylized children, who at christmas and birthdays are in style with their stylish parents. you have to be awfully stylish yourself not to get sick of it once in a while. it's the style that gets you; technological ugliness syruped over with romantic phoniness in an effort to produce beauty and profit by people who, though stylish, don't know where to start because no one has ever told them there's such a thing as quality in this world and it's real, not style. quality isn't something you lay on top of subjects and objects like tinsel on a christmas tree. real quality must be the source of subjects and objects, the cone from which the tree must start.science seeks to explain the world with cold facts. hard objects (hmmm...) and set methods. a fool proof manual for life. science fools us into thinking we can just turn up and produce goodness and quality by following a set of instructions or rules that are devoid of any emotional involvement.
but following a step-by-step jamie oliver cook book doesn't make you a good chef. similarly owning a david beckham football training video won't make you a good footballer (mainly because beckham isn't a good footballer... but that's besides the point). and going to guitar lessons won't make you a good musician. science or truth has been put on a pedestal as the ultimate "answer" - when in fact it is just a side branch of knowledge. what science fails to recognise is "feeling". it has detached us from our surroundings by disregarding spirituality and irrationality. it gives no value to peace of mind - that which produces goodness or quality.
the key to peace of mind is to eliminate the subject-object reality that dominates our conciousness. zen talks about mechanics and motorcyle maintenance and "just fixing" - to have a feeling of complete indentification with one's circumstances. to become one with the surrounding environment. to care. some people might find this harmony through mediation. some may experience it through the arts. some through music. or dancing. or martial arts. or fishing. or surfing (the search for the perfect wave bro). some may even find it in their day jobs.
for me: it's football. (very occasionally) dualistic thinking stops. it's no longer "me" and "the rest of the world". my mind becomes a blank canvas. suddenly i am one with the ball, and the other players, and the field, and the goals. i no longer have to think about what i'm going to do, or where i should be, or who i should pass to. it just comes naturally. conciousness and the changing nature of the game seem to flow through me in parallel. inspiration. an inner quietness. attentiveness and caring. peace of mind: we have all experienced it in one way or another. we have all been "in the zone".
zen says this is how we should feel in every activity in our everyday lives. this oneness, this harmony with the "outside" world and with nature. zen sees this as the answer to mass disillusionment in a society which just wants to get through their mundane everyday lives (their daily jobs, their daily travelling, their daily cooking, their daily cleaning) and on to something else.
"work to live rather than live to work" is popular romantic remark. but it is also a rather sad statement in that it implies that one is spending the majority of time doing something they don't really want to do, in some place they don't really want to be. just getting by. detatched and uninterested. a low quality existence. but we do it because it makes "sense".
so i guess what zen is trying to say is that sometimes you don't need to do what makes sense... you need to do what feels right.
in the past our common universe of reason has been in the process of escaping, rejecting the romantic, irrational world of prehistoric man. it's been necessary since before the time of socrates to reject the passions, the emotions, in order to free the rational mind for an understanding of nature's order which was as yet unknown. now it's time to further an understanding of nature's order by reassimilating those passions which were originally fled from. the passions, the emotions, the affective domain of man's conciousness, are part of nature's order too. the central part.